Form following function

My father loves trains. He loves them so much thatoften than not comes down to the bike that stirs
he buys dvd’s about trains and train trips acrossyour heart? The bike that makes you want to poke
America. Classic trains or modern trains he is trainyour head in the garage 1000 times a day just to
nuts. While watching those videos about the old trainmake sure “she” is still OK? The bike that
engines and train cars with him, I started thinkingyour wife calls the “other woman” because
about design and use.you “spend more time with her than you do with
Looking at the way the cars were appointed (theme”?
polished brass trim, plush upholstery, carved wood,I began to realize that function actually could work
etc.) really made me think about how we (the humantogether with form instead of beating it into a bloody
race) went from function following form, to formpulp. Maybe all it takes is manufacturers
following function. Humans used to put form first in aunderstanding that their customers are driven by
lot of what we did. No matter where you look thepassion and not logic. Understanding the product they
engineer’s function has supplanted theare selling is selling because while nobody
designer’s form in the modern world.“needs” it a lot of people “want” it
I really started to despair about this loss of artistry in(“it” being whatever they are building).
our daily lives. OK so despair may be too strong aMaybe these are the reasons why the exotics
word, but it did get me down a little. I started(Ferrari, Lamborghini, Bugatti, etc..) Are also one of
pondering some of my favorite things and how theythe last places you can go to find function and form
have changed over time to become slaves toplaying nicely together.
function. I began to wonder if this form followingMotorcyclists (and the really rich) are some of the
function illness was as widespread as I originallylast holdouts that prove there is still a minority of
thought. After giving this subject much thought Ipeople that aren’t willing to give up style just to
came to a few conclusions, some of which I’llget a few more miles to the gallon. People that
share with you. I think that it can be said with somerefuse to go quietly into that dark night of bland,
degree of certainty that a Douglas DC-3 is a muchvisually offensive machinery that has no soul or
prettier airplane than a Boeing 737. I think we alsopassion.
would agree that a 1950’s era Buick is muchMaybe this is why people in Great Britain and
prettier than anything they’ve built recently. IEuropean countries are more motorcycle mad than
could also list boats in this as well since an oldthose in the USA. They are surrounded by old
wooden Chris Craft is much prettier than a newarchitecture and beauty in engineering far more than
Bayliner.those of us here in the States. They see function
Of course my thoughts turned to motorcycles nextand form working hand in hand everywhere and
(you’ve been waiting for this haven’t you). Imotorcycles fit into that "visual pattern" very nicely.
started thinking about 50’s and 60’s eraAmericans (North Americans for my Latin American
Triumphs, BSAs and Nortons, not to mentionreaders) view motorcycles as toys and not
Ducati’s and Moto Guzzi’s. I then started tosomething practical. We like our lives to be
mentally compare those bikes with their modernsurrounded with things that make our lives easier,
counterparts. I realized that the design ofdon't need too much attention, don't cause us to
motorcycles (with a few exceptions) hasn’tmiss the important phone calls about our dry cleaning
fallen into the same function trap as everything else.being done, and can transport us to our destination
Can anyone truly say that the design of a Ducatiwithout causing any wrinkles or messed up hair.
(except the Multistrada) is completely engineer drivenMotorcycles don't do any of these things.
with little to no thought for beauty? Is a 1964 DucatiMotorcycles stir your passions. They call out your
250 Mach 1 more beautiful than the 1098? Is a 1966name on beautiful evenings cajoling you into going for
Triumph Bonneville more visually appealing than thea ride. They require you to mess up your hair and
new Daytona 675?get road grit on your clothes. They won't keep you
Obviously beauty is in the eye of the beholder, but Idry in the rain or warm in the cold. They can be
think that most people will agree that when it comestemperamental and fussy. Motorcyclists (real ones
to motorcycle design, form can exist on equal termsanyway) understand this and embrace it. Helmet hair
with function. But why is that? Why do motorcycles,is a hot fashion trend and being sweaty = having fun.
one of the last bastions of beautiful forms, co-existForm following function or function following form?
with function? Is it because motorcycles are notWhich would you choose? Me? I think I'll go mess up
logical? Is it because a motorcycle purchase moremy hair and get sweaty.